The Aesir Gods: A Vanatru perspective
| The Death of Baldur by Christoffer Eckersburg |
First of all I would like to state that this post is in no way intended as a representation of the personal values or beliefs of Vanatru as a community. The following is simply my own explanation of the way THIS Vanatru sees the Aesir Gods, and a bit of explanation as to why their is at times conflict between Asatru and Vanatru beliefs.
It is much easier to understand the difference between Asatru and Vanatru if one views them in much the same sense as one views different sects of Christianity. The same basic cosmological system, yet viewed from two different perspectives or viewpoints. Not always in agreement on certain aspects of divinity or practice.
So, let's start with the facts, or atleast the things most of us can agree on. The Aesir are race of Gods that are best known to the layperson. Odin, Thor, Frigga, Baldur, Sif, Tyr, all these Gods are traditionally Aesir. Most of the Eddic Lore that has survived is directly concerned with the Aesir Gods, and their personal belief system, ideas such as the World Tree, The weaving of Wyrd, and other well known cosmological aspects of Heathenry.
So who are the Vanir? Well, it is hard to say. They are Gods in the same sense of being as the Aesir. They possess power in equal measure. And at some point in time, the Vanir came into conflict with the Aesir. They warred for a time, and from what is said in the lore, Odin and the Aesir eventually came to the conclusion that they were not able to defeat the Vanir. So as an act of truce they exchanged hostages, the first attempt at which came to create yet more conflict.
Eventually these conflicts were settled, and the Vanic Gods Njord and his son Freyr came to live among the Aesir as equals. Also joining them was Freyja, the sister of Freyr, another well known Vanic Goddess, though it is not implicitly stated that Freyja herself was part of the truce. Indeed one is more apt to think that Freyja came to be among the Aesir wholly of her own accord. For Asatru and Vanatru, the circumstances of this exchange create a conflict of belief. This can be explained partly by etymological issues.
The Old Norse language can be confusing in that one word may have a variety of possible translations which might effect the meaning of a sentence or concept. Take the word Disir, which is commonly used to describe female ancestral spirits. But in other circumstances it can describe one's animal double, a female giant or spirit, a goddess, or even a human woman. Indeed the word Disir at it's simplest simply denotes a female gendered being. Yet it's most common usage in the historical text indicates a common connotation to female ancestors. Therefore one word may have a variety of possible meanings which simply are unknown now.
The word Aesir is similar in this. The word Aesir simply denotes God status (plural). In specific context it refers to the Aesir tribe of Gods, as separate from the Vanir tribe of Gods. In our modern understanding of the lore, there is simply no way to know which sense the authors presented this relationship between the Aesir and Vanir.
Asatru would argue that when the principle Vanir God joined the Aesir as companions, they in essence were absorbed into the Aesir pantheon, simply becoming Aesir as well. Whereas a Vanatru typically will doubt this assumption, and believe that though the Vanir lived among the Aesir, they kept their own seperate tribal identity intact, and remained Vanir.
This is a very simplified account of one of the major differences which create conflict between Asatru and Vanatru. There are many others. The simplified view of the Aesir as enlightened sky Gods and the Vanir as earthly fertility gods is one that may make sense to Asatru but for Vanatru may be degrading and at times insulting.
So what is the major conflict for Vanatru, the major difference that calls some to the Aesir and others to the Vanir. This can be answered in one word. PATRIARCHY.
Thought the Aesir Gods are worlds away from Christianity, nonetheless the Aesir cosmos is one which is essentially patriarchal. The masculine force is the rule. The Aesir Goddesses have much depth but for all this they never quite move beyond their role as wives, mothers, and hearth keepers. In examining the Eddic Lore, transcribed by a Christian author, it is at times hard to tell how much Christian thought influenced the stories Snorri wrote. There are gaps in stories, empty spaces that lead the reader to wonder what was being hidden, or what information was simply "too pagan" to include.
Sadly for the Vanatru, much of this absent information seems to be directly related to the lore of the Vanir. Also worth noting is that the Vanir tribe of gods does not reflect patriarchy.In fact the best loved of the Vanir is Freyja, and in many ways the most powerful. It is Freyja who teaches Odin magick. It is Freyja who embarks as a lone female into the world in search of Odr. She was free with her sexual favors, and her father Njord defended her in this during the Flyting of Loki. Indeed the only instance of Freyja being obedient to male commands involved her being blackmailed. Freyja herself is a powerful argument against patriarchy in Vanir myth.
There simply is NO implicit gender based social hierarchy among the Vanir reflected in the Eddas or any other historical text. Sadly their is little left of Vanir cosmology or belief either. Many wonder if the abscence of lore indicates that Vanir myth and practice was perhaps that part of the myths that Snorri found to be "too pagan." Of course these are all questions that no one can answer.
The important thing to understand is that Vanatru do not seek to demonize the Aesir. We simply wish to worship our Gods, that we feel personally connected to, while keeping possible cultural and cosmological value systems separate, as we see them, rather than view our Gods as simply an absorbed faction of the Norse pantheon.
The wisdom and the lore of the Aesir is relevant to Vanatru. Regardless as to how one views the Gods and their hierarchy, there is no denying that both cultural races of Gods had much in common, just as they had many differences. The Aesir should be important to a Vanatru, simply because there Lore is often the only source, though sparse, for Vanic Lore in literature. The Aesir should be respected, as many of them were close friends and helpmates to the our own Gods.
In Frith,
Cena
This Post Created for the Pagan Blog Project by Rowan Pendragon
Remember though that part of the problem is that most of the lays were recorded by Christian peoples who would naturally increase the male dominance, and Snorri, even wove christian elements into his work on the Prose Edda. So the lore is not perfect, nor would I argue is it a completely accurate guide to how the gods were actually viewed.
ReplyDeleteBut understand it's tough thing and all heathens struggle with it. I'm glad your interpretation works for you!
I mentioned the Christian influence, and I think it is obvious that the lore is at best a fairly poor reflection of the culture and beliefs itself. However I do not believe that the male dominance factor found in the Aesir lore was somehow made up by Christian writers either.
ReplyDeleteFor the sake of brevity I stuck to the literary theme in this post, but literary evidence is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Linguistics, archaeology, cultural studies, gender studies, anthropology, all these and more need to be considered before forming an opinion, and learning is never static. I do not believe there is a perfect guide to how the old ones viewed the Gods.
I simply try and learn as much as I can, meditate as much as I can, and listen to what the Gods tell me if they choose to communicate. It is all any of us can do.
As a non-heathen this was a really interesting read. I do deal with the aesir in my own path, but I hadn't realised there was a gap between followers of those and the vanir.
ReplyDeleteI defo understand that Shen, I was a pagan when I was drawn to Freyja in particular. It took me a very long time to feel like I had actually gotten a good handle on the Lore and heathenry in general. I still struggle with whether or not I am actually a heathen or a pagan, being as there are some general heathen ideals that I don't ascribe to. So for now I stick with Vanatru, it works for me. I spent about a year studying the Aesir and living heathen, but in the end I simply felt like I just did not connect with the Aesir. It was a struggle at times, but one I think all pagans/heathens go through.
ReplyDeleteIN Frith,
Cena
I tags you! Don't hate me please :P
ReplyDeletehttp://frecklesgrrl.blogspot.com/2012/01/wooo-i-got-tagged.html
Hello Cena, nice article. I understand quite well this difference between the Aesir and Vanir conflict - The Aesir seem to be more dominant of nature, more power based, and the Vanir seem more mellow and friendlier.
ReplyDeleteOfcourse every tribe/sibbe/region has it's own preferences and views with a different focus on specific deities depending on what is needed. Even when using the same name, the aspects chosen canstill differ.
In other words, people use their mythology, their stories and history to fit their own lives. We, here in the Netherlands seem much more mellow for example then people from elsewhere. Instead of Odin and Thor, we call then Wodan and Donar - But indeed Freija is still the main matron. I personally also like the Kalevala very much - it as well holds much more Vanatru (fertility) aspects. For me, I'm unbound, I relate to my spirituality via my landscape in combination with the stories, ancestors and the land. Germanic animism might be a good term haha.. But I think captivating things in steady boxes limits it in the way that you get bound by expectations. It shouldn't be needed to start with a disclaimer.. From the land, to the land, kind regards, SjpielseWolf
Nicole: grrrrrrr how dare u! :p
ReplyDeleteSjpielseWolf: I defo agree with your comments, and your right it shouldn't need a disclaimer but I know that there are those who would try to crucify me without one. So it is simply easier to let it be known beforehand.
Germanic animism is actually nice term for it, one I never thought of but my own beliefs are very much in line with that.
In Frith
Cena
Great post - it is always interesting to read the various interpretations of others on old belief systems, really we can 'know' very little of any of it.
ReplyDelete